Year 2008, Volume 28 , Issue 2, Pages 109 - 128 2008-06-01

Current State and Understanding of Critical Thinking in Higher Education
Yüksek Eğitimde Eleştirel Düşüncenin Durumu ve Anlayışı

Kemal Sinan ÖZMEN [1]


This paper reviews the literature of Critical Thinking (CT) in higher education of modern societies. Some cornerstone studies on CT are discussed in relation with the other influential works of educational pioneers by referring to key definitions. Also, the current state of CT skills, tendencies and beliefs of educators, the state undergraduates and graduate students in academic environments are accentuated so as to discuss the need of improving CT in our country.
Bu makale Eleştirel Düşünce (ED) literatürünü yüksek eğitim bağlamında incelemektedir. ED üzerine en önemli çalışmalar, eğitim bilimlerinde bu konuya öncülük etmiş bilimadamlarının yorumlarıyla ilişkilendirilerek ve temel tanımlara dayanarak tartışılmıştır. Bunların yanısıra, ülkemizde ED\'nin gelişmesine katkı sağlamak adına ED\'nin yüksek eğitimde günümüzdeki yeri, eğitimcilerin eğilim ve görüşleri ve yüksek eğitim öğrencilerinin durumları üzerinde durulmuştur.
  • Anderson, L. W. E. & Krathwhol, D. R. E. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy forLearning, Teaching and Assessment A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. (Vol. 1). New York: Longman.
  • Bailin, S., Case, R., Coombers, J. R., &Daniels, L. B. (1999). Conceptualizing Critical Thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, Volume 31-3, 285-302
  • Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc
  • Bloom, B. S. & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, by a Committee of College and University Examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman, Green.
  • Barnett, R. (1997). Higher education: A critical business. Buckingham, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
  • Cathers, W. H. (2000) The apology by Plato: An introduction, presented at the Aspen Institute Community Great Ideas Seminar: Aspen, CO
  • Dewey, J. (1933). Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan.
  • Ennis, R. H. (1991). Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception. Teaching Philosophy, Volume 14-1,
  • Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical Thinking Assessment: Theory into Practice, Vol.32, No.3, p. 179-186
  • Glaser, R, E. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologists, Volume 39-2, 93-104.
  • Gardiner, L. (1995). Redesigning Higher Education: Producing Dramatic Gains in Student Learning (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, vol. 23, no. 7).
  • Facione, P. A. (1989). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction: Research Findings and Recommendations (The Delphi Report). ERIC Doc No: ED. 315 423.
  • Facione, P.A., Facione N. C., and Giancarlo, C. (2000). The Disposition toward Critical Thinking: Its Character, Measurement, and Relationship to Critical Thinking Skills, Journal of Informal Logic, Volume 20-1 61-84.
  • Fisher, St. (2001). Making Hope Practical and Despair Unconvincing: Some Thoughts on Transformative Education. Appalachian Journal, 29(1-2), 90 97.3.
  • Kearsley, G. (2003, April 10). Cognitive Dissonance (L. Festinger). In Explorations in Learning & Instruction:The Theory into Practice Database <http://tip.psychologv.org/> (2006Januaray 13,)
  • Kurfiss,J, G. (1988). Critical Thinking: Theory, research, practice, and possibilities. In ASHE-ERIC Higher Education report no.2 Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
  • Ikuenobe, P. (2001). Questioning as an Epistemic Process of Critical Thinking: Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 33, Nos. 3 & 4
  • İşpiroğlu, Z. (1996). Düşünmeyi Öğrenmek ve Öğretmek İstanbul: Cem Yayınevi
  • McCarthy, M, C (2004). Critical Thinking Disposition, Belief Perspective, and Academic Performance: Examining Relationships. Doctoral Thesis, UMI 3124282
  • McPeck, J. (1981). Critical Thinking and Education. New York: St.Martin’s Press
  • Moore, T. (2004). The Critical Thinking Debate: How General are General Thinking Skills? Higher Education Research & Development. 23 (1), 3 - 18.
  • National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. Washington DC.
  • Norris, S.P. (1985). Synthesis of Research on Critical Thinking. Educational Leadership, 42 (8), 40-45
  • Paul, W.R. (1990). Critical Thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking
  • Paul, W.R. (1993) Critical Thinking: How to Prepare Students for a Rapidly Changing World. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
  • Paul, W.R., Elder, L. & Bartell, T. (1997). California Teacher Preparation for Instruction in Critical Thinking: Research Findings and Policy Recommendations. Sacramento, CA: California Commission of Teacher Credentialing
  • Paul, W.R. (2004, July 20) The State of Critical Thinking Today: The Need for a Substantive Concept of Critical Thinking As the Organizer in Developing Blueprints for Institutional Change < http://www.criticalthinking.org.> (2005, December 14)
  • Pohl, A. (2005). Language Learning Histories: An Introduction To Critical Thinking, 18th Annual EA Education Conference, English Language Centre, Swinburne University of Technology
  • Pithers, R. & Soden, R. (1999). Assessing Vocational Tutors' Thinking Skills. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 51, 23-37.
  • Steen, L. (1987). Mathematics Education\ A Predictor of Scientific Competitiveness. Science, 237, 251-252, 302
Primary Language tr
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Author: Kemal Sinan ÖZMEN

Dates

Publication Date : June 1, 2008

Bibtex @ { gefad90717, journal = {Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi}, issn = {1301-9058}, address = {}, publisher = {Gazi University}, year = {2008}, volume = {28}, pages = {109 - 128}, doi = {}, title = {Yüksek Eğitimde Eleştirel Düşüncenin Durumu ve Anlayışı}, key = {cite}, author = {ÖZMEN, Kemal Sinan} }
APA ÖZMEN, K . (2008). Yüksek Eğitimde Eleştirel Düşüncenin Durumu ve Anlayışı. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi , 28 (2) , 109-128 . Retrieved from http://www.gefad.gazi.edu.tr/en/issue/6747/90717
MLA ÖZMEN, K . "Yüksek Eğitimde Eleştirel Düşüncenin Durumu ve Anlayışı". Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 28 (2008 ): 109-128 <http://www.gefad.gazi.edu.tr/en/issue/6747/90717>
Chicago ÖZMEN, K . "Yüksek Eğitimde Eleştirel Düşüncenin Durumu ve Anlayışı". Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 28 (2008 ): 109-128
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Yüksek Eğitimde Eleştirel Düşüncenin Durumu ve Anlayışı AU - Kemal Sinan ÖZMEN Y1 - 2008 PY - 2008 N1 - DO - T2 - Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 109 EP - 128 VL - 28 IS - 2 SN - 1301-9058- M3 - UR - Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi Yüksek Eğitimde Eleştirel Düşüncenin Durumu ve Anlayışı %A Kemal Sinan ÖZMEN %T Yüksek Eğitimde Eleştirel Düşüncenin Durumu ve Anlayışı %D 2008 %J Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi %P 1301-9058- %V 28 %N 2 %R %U
ISNAD ÖZMEN, Kemal Sinan . "Yüksek Eğitimde Eleştirel Düşüncenin Durumu ve Anlayışı". Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 28 / 2 (June 2008): 109-128 .
AMA ÖZMEN K . Yüksek Eğitimde Eleştirel Düşüncenin Durumu ve Anlayışı. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2008; 28(2): 109-128.
Vancouver ÖZMEN K . Yüksek Eğitimde Eleştirel Düşüncenin Durumu ve Anlayışı. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2008; 28(2): 128-109.